nobleplatypus: (five ooooh celery)
nobleplatypus ([personal profile] nobleplatypus) wrote 2012-11-30 05:35 pm (UTC)

I think that's a pretty accurate summation of my attitude--most of the time--though I'm not speaking for the whole community.

As I briefly addressed upthread with [livejournal.com profile] hukbillgoomba, I'm not going to automatically support a fictional, canonical romance just because the characters are okay with it. I might find it problematic for other reasons, like, "I think having a relationship begin with the man following the woman around even though she tells him to quit it perpetuates some pretty gross ideas about what constitutes 'romance,'" but I don't find sex or romance inherently problematic or bothersome in fiction. Or in real life, so long as it's not involving me.

Or, to put it more bluntly, the fact that I am disinterested in sex and romance, personally, does not mean that I never want to see it anywhere and wish it would all just go away. :P

That being said, I do have a really strong appreciation for fictional platonic relationships and would kind of like to see more of those. And I do find myself feeling irked when fandom absolutely insists on projecting romance onto awesome friendships. There's nothing wrong with valuing romantic relationships, but the attitude that a relationship can't be close/deep/significant unless it's romantic (and therefore sexual) can't die quickly enough, as far as I'm concerned.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting